That’s the stuff you need to ensure you can restore to an empty disk when the time comes.Īnd that’s the stuff that, if corrupted, would also prevent you from performing that restore – just as Macrium was unable to perform the restore.īut you can still get at all the individual uncorrupted files, just like you can with Macrium. A full- image backup also includes things like partition information, boot information, file system overhead, and more. The exact same thing could still happen using your suggested “store it all as individual files” approach.įor the backup you’re looking for to be a true replacement for an image file, it needs to include much more than just the files on the system. mrimg image file, even though there was corruption somewhere in that file that prevented it from attempting a full restore. 1Īs you saw, Macrium Reflect was still able to extract individual files from a single. What happens next depends on what that data represents – regardless of how it’s stored. If you’re going to have a problem somewhere in that 10 gigabytes, then by definition it will happen inside that 10 gigabyte file, if that’s the storage you’re using or, it’ll happen in only one of the 10,000 files, if that’s the approach taken. ![]() While I take issue with your comment that “it’s relatively easily to corrupt” a file (it shouldn’t be, for a system working even moderately well), the fact is that a larger file represents a larger target. The question is, which is more resilient to corruption. In once case, it’s stored in one massive file in another, it’s stored across a collection of 10,000 smaller files. You can store it as:Įach represents the exact same data. However, while I could be wrong, I don’t think the solution you’re proposing actually solves the problem you think it does.įor simplicity’s sake, let’s describe the problem this way: you have 10 gigabytes of data. There are reasons individual file backups can be useful. Nor is the concept limited to just backups, believe it or not. Your line of reasoning isn’t at all new I get comments similar to this relatively often. Interested to hear your thoughts on this, and if you know any programs that can do something along these lines.Īctually I have several thoughts, but I’ll answer your last question first: no, I’m not aware of a backup program that works as you’ve outlined. If each file (or folder, or some subset) is backed up individually corruption is likely to take out a small subset of your backups, not the whole backup. So my concern is that if you have one huge backup image (which for me could be 2TB+) or even one logical backup file split into say 1GB chunks it’s relatively easily to corrupt that single file/backup set. Fortunately even if the backup is corrupt you can still browse it to get individual files out, but you can’t restore the whole backup. However I now have some corrupt files, including some Macrium reflect disk images. I still can’t figure that out, but anyway, it’s replaced now and works fine. ![]() Eventually it turned out all four sticks of RAM, when used together, caused data corruption, but any two worked fine. I’ve been suffering from some minor disk corruption over the past couple of years.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |